Parlamentn\u00edListy.cz po\u017e\u00e1daly c\u00edrkevn\u00edho historika Radom\u00edra Mal\u00e9ho, kter\u00fd vyu\u010duje na Teologick\u00e9 fakult\u011b Jiho\u010desk\u00e9 univerzity v \u010cesk\u00fdch Bud\u011bjovic\u00edch, aby zhodnotil pontifik\u00e1t pape\u017ee Benedikta XVI., kter\u00fd p\u0159ekvapiv\u011b ozn\u00e1mil svou brzkou abdikaci.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u201eTriumf a tragika Benedikta XVI. Nikoli n\u00e1hodou jsem si vyp\u016fj\u010dil tento n\u00e1zev z knihy Stefana Zweiga Triumf a tragika Erasma Rotterdamsk\u00e9ho. Domn\u00edv\u00e1m se toti\u017e, \u017ee nen\u00ed nic p\u0159il\u00e9hav\u011bj\u0161\u00edho pro ozna\u010den\u00ed pontifik\u00e1tu tohoto pape\u017ee, jen\u017e kon\u010d\u00ed netradi\u010dn\u00edm zp\u016fsobem \u2013 Benediktovou demis\u00ed.\u00a0Osm let, b\u011bhem nich\u017e st\u00e1l v \u010dele C\u00edrkve, bylo na jedn\u00e9 stran\u011b triumfem, ale na druh\u00e9 tragikou,\u00a0za ni\u017e\u00a0nenese odpov\u011bdnost\u00a0bezprost\u0159edn\u011b on, ale cel\u00fd dobov\u00fd kontext, v n\u011bm\u017e mu bylo d\u00e1no p\u016fsobit,\u201c zhodnotil pro Parlamentn\u00edListy.cz nyn\u011bj\u0161\u00ed hlavu Katolick\u00e9 c\u00edrkve historik Mal\u00fd.<\/p>\n

V\u00fdrazn\u011b vstoupil na sc\u00e9nu na II. vatik\u00e1nsk\u00e9m koncilu<\/h4>\n

Radom\u00edr Mal\u00fd p\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1, \u017ee Joseph Ratzinger vstoupil na sc\u00e9nu c\u00edrkevn\u00edho d\u011bn\u00ed na p\u0159elomov\u00e9m Druh\u00e9m vatik\u00e1nsk\u00e9m koncilu jako \u201eperitus\u201c, neboli poradce kardin\u00e1la Fringse z Kol\u00edna nad R\u00fdnem. Pat\u0159il spolu s Karlem Rahnerem, Hansem K\u00fcngem, Edwardem Schillebeeckxem a dal\u0161\u00edmi \u201eperiti\u201c k aktivn\u00edm propag\u00e1tor\u016fm takzvan\u00e9ho otev\u0159en\u00ed se C\u00edrkve sv\u011btu a m\u00e1 lv\u00ed pod\u00edl na zm\u011bn\u00e1ch, kter\u00e9 koncil postuloval. Sou\u010dasn\u00edci ozna\u010dovali tenkr\u00e1t II. Vatik\u00e1n jako \u201eVelkou francouzskou revoluci v C\u00edrkvi\u201c.<\/p>\n

Mal\u00fd \u0159\u00edk\u00e1, \u017ee Francouzsk\u00e1 revoluce onoho koncilu neznamenala svr\u017een\u00ed katolick\u00e9 v\u011brouky a mravouky, kterou pr\u00fd koncil naopak potvrdil, ale zm\u011bnu orientace, postoje k nekatolick\u00fdm k\u0159es\u0165an\u016fm,\u00a0nek\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00fdm n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00edm a k sekul\u00e1rn\u00edmu st\u00e1tu.<\/p>\n

\u201eDosavadn\u00ed obrann\u00e1 linie byla nahrazena dialogem a vst\u0159\u00edcn\u00fdmi gesty, sugeruj\u00edc\u00edmi, \u017ee ve skute\u010dnosti m\u00e1me v\u0161ichni hodn\u011b spole\u010dn\u00e9ho a proto jsme p\u0159\u00e1tel\u00e9 a mus\u00edme spolupracovat. Apologie katolicismu a polemika s nekatol\u00edky byly odm\u00edtnuty,\u201c \u0159\u00edk\u00e1 k tomu Mal\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Benedikt XVI. \u2013 um\u00edrn\u011bn\u00fd revolucion\u00e1\u0159 \u010del\u00edc\u00ed jakob\u00edn\u016fm<\/h4>\n

\u201eM\u00e1me-li se dr\u017eet srovn\u00e1n\u00ed s Francouzskou revoluc\u00ed, tak tenkr\u00e1t klub\u00a0feuillant\u016f v \u010dele s Lafayettem prosadil p\u0159ijet\u00ed osv\u00edcensk\u00fdch po\u017eadavk\u016f svobod\u00a0a lidsk\u00fdch pr\u00e1v p\u0159edstaviteli monarchie v domn\u011bn\u00ed, \u017ee t\u00edm bude tato instituce \u00b4modernizov\u00e1na\u00b4 a tud\u00ed\u017e pro budoucnost zachr\u00e1n\u011bna. Stal se ale prav\u00fd opak, nebo\u0165 toto objet\u00ed monarchie s osv\u00edcensk\u00fdmi lidskopr\u00e1vn\u00edmi principy se pro ni stalo n\u00e1ru\u010d\u00ed smrti. V dal\u0161\u00ed f\u00e1zi revoluce, jak zn\u00e1mo, byla monarchie svr\u017eena a kr\u00e1l Ludv\u00edk XVI. popraven. Lafayette toto necht\u011bl, je\u0161t\u011b p\u0159ed ni\u010div\u00fdm po\u017e\u00e1rem republik\u00e1nstv\u00ed a jakobinismu tvrd\u011b zas\u00e1hl proti radik\u00e1l\u016fm na Martov\u011b poli,\u00a0co\u017e ale znamenalo Pyrrhovo v\u00edt\u011bzstv\u00ed. P\u00e1d monarchie se poda\u0159ilo pouze odd\u00e1lit, nikoli mu zabr\u00e1nit. Dal\u0161\u00ed v\u00fdvoj ud\u00e1lost\u00ed smetl nakonec i Lafayetta, ani\u017e si p\u0159iznal, \u017ee j\u00e1dro pudla tkv\u011blo u\u017e v\u00a0 samotn\u00e9 my\u0161lence symbi\u00f3zy monarchie s\u00a0osv\u00edcensk\u00fdmi ideologick\u00fdmi proudy,\u201c \u0159\u00edk\u00e1 Mal\u00fd a pokra\u010duje ve srovn\u00e1n\u00ed II. Vatik\u00e1nu a Velk\u00e9 francouzsk\u00e9 revoluce.<\/p>\n

\u201eTeologi\u010dt\u00ed protagonist\u00e9 koncilu Hans K\u00fcng, Karl Rahner a dal\u0161\u00ed se nakonec stali Dantony, Saint Justy a\u00a0Robespierry, kte\u0159\u00ed podnikli front\u00e1ln\u00ed \u00fatok proti katolick\u00e9 dogmatice a mor\u00e1lce. Ne tak Ratzinger, kter\u00fd\u00a0setrval na pozici Lafayettov\u011b:\u00a0horoval pro katolickou pravov\u011brnost, ale z\u00e1rove\u0148 i pro \u00b4otev\u0159enost\u00b4 C\u00edrkve. Podobn\u00fd postoj zaujali i pokonciln\u00ed pape\u017eov\u00e9 Pavel VI. a Jan Pavel II., pro n\u011b\u017e se stal vzd\u011blan\u00fd teolog Ratzinger cennou osobnost\u00ed, proto byl jmenov\u00e1n kardin\u00e1lem a\u00a0roce 1981 prefektem Kongregace pro nauku v\u00edry,\u201c dodal Radom\u00edr Mal\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Zas\u00e1hl proti marxismu v C\u00edrkvi<\/h4>\n

Podle Mal\u00e9ho Joseph Ratzinger ve funkci prefekta Kongregace pro nauku v\u00edry vykonal\u00a0mnoho dobr\u00e9 pr\u00e1ce. N\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed heterodoxn\u00ed (nepravov\u011brn\u00ed) teologov\u00e9 p\u0159i\u0161li o kanonickou misi, K\u00fcng je\u0161t\u011b p\u0159ed Ratzingerov\u00fdm n\u00e1stupem do \u00fa\u0159adu, za jeho p\u016fsoben\u00ed potom Leonardo Boff a dal\u0161\u00ed aktivist\u00e9 marxisticky lad\u011bn\u00e9 teologie osvobozen\u00ed v Latinsk\u00e9 Americe,\u00a0v USA Charles Curran, v N\u011bmecku Eugen Drewermann aj.<\/p>\n

\u201eI kdy\u017e posti\u017eeni byli jen n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed a neznamenalo to n\u00e1vrat pravov\u011brnosti na katolick\u00e1 u\u010dili\u0161t\u011b, p\u0159ece jen nelze up\u0159\u00edt, \u017ee jist\u00e1 opat\u0159en\u00ed na obranu katolick\u00e9 identity byla u\u010din\u011bna. Ratzinger\u016fv \u00fa\u0159ad tak\u00e9 vydal n\u011bkolik prohl\u00e1\u0161en\u00ed jasn\u011b definuj\u00edc\u00edch v\u00edru a odsuzuj\u00edc\u00edch bludy, nap\u0159\u00edklad o homosexualit\u011b, duchovensk\u00e9m sv\u011bcen\u00ed \u017een, trassubstanciaci a tak d\u00e1le. Kardin\u00e1l Ratzinger se tak\u00e9 stal v\u011brn\u00fdm spojencem pape\u017ee Jana Pavla II. v jeho z\u00e1pase\u00a0proti potrat\u016fm a eutan\u00e1zii. T\u00e9to linii z\u016fstal v\u011brn\u00fd i jako pape\u017e Benedikt XVI,\u201c p\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1 Mal\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Otev\u0159en\u00ed se C\u00edrkve sv\u011btu: Assisi, Mekka, vyprazd\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed chr\u00e1m\u016f i semin\u00e1\u0159\u016f<\/h4>\n

Podle Radom\u00edra Mal\u00e9ho byl Benedikt XVI. p\u0159i sv\u00e9m pontifik\u00e1tu v\u011brn\u00fdm\u00a0pokra\u010dovatelem linie sv\u00e9ho p\u0159edch\u016fdce, by\u0165 s jist\u00fdmi modifikacemi. \u201eJedn\u00e1 se ale \u017eel o linii Lafayettovu: na jedn\u00e9 stran\u011b \u017e\u00e1douc\u00ed a\u00a0\u00factyhodn\u00e1\u00a0obrana katolick\u00fdch princip\u016f, na druh\u00e9 v\u0161ak neust\u00e1l\u00e9 zd\u016fraz\u0148ov\u00e1n\u00ed konciln\u00edch dokument\u016f a jeho \u00b4otev\u0159en\u00ed se\u00b4. Benedikt XVI. podobn\u011b jako Jan Pavel II. kategoricky odm\u00edt\u00e1 revolu\u010dn\u00ed postul\u00e1ty rozkladn\u00fdch hnut\u00ed \u00e1 la rakousk\u00e1 \u00b4Far\u00e1\u0159sk\u00e1 iniciativa\u00b4, trv\u00e1\u00a0pro duchovenstvo latinsk\u00e9ho ritu na celib\u00e1tu, nem\u00edn\u00ed diskutovat o mo\u017enosti sv\u011bcen\u00ed \u017een a p\u0159ipu\u0161t\u011bn\u00ed rozveden\u00fdch a znovu pouze civiln\u011b sezdan\u00fdch ke svat\u00e9mu p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed, odm\u00edt\u00e1 interkomunio (p\u0159ij\u00edm\u00e1n\u00ed) s protestanty, nekompromisn\u011b h\u00e1j\u00ed transsubstanciaci a podobn\u011b,\u201c zd\u016fraznil pape\u017eovy klady Mal\u00fd.<\/p>\n

P\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1 ale i negativn\u00ed kroky pape\u017ee: \u201eAle z\u00e1rove\u0148 tak\u00e9 vstoupil do me\u0161ity a uklonil se \u010delem k Mekce, zorganizoval podobn\u011b jako jeho p\u0159edch\u016fdce mezin\u00e1bo\u017eensk\u00e9 setk\u00e1n\u00ed v Assisi a\u00a0vyj\u00e1d\u0159il se pozitivn\u011b o sekul\u00e1rn\u00edm st\u00e1tu, jen\u017e\u00a0odsunul n\u00e1bo\u017eenstv\u00ed do ryze soukrom\u00e9 sf\u00e9ry. Jde o poplatnost II. Vatik\u00e1nu, jeho\u017e byl spolustr\u016fjcem a nep\u0159ekro\u010dil sv\u016fj st\u00edn, i kdy\u017e n\u011bkte\u0159\u00ed katoli\u010dt\u00ed tradicionalist\u00e9 v to doufali. Pape\u017e Benedikt nejsp\u00ed\u0161 v\u011b\u0159\u00ed, \u017ee linie \u00b4otev\u0159en\u00ed se C\u00edrkve sv\u011btu\u00b4, jak byla nastolena na Druh\u00e9m vatik\u00e1nsk\u00e9m koncilu, je spr\u00e1vn\u00e1 a pom\u016f\u017ee j\u00ed\u00a0prov\u00e9st novou evangelizaci Evropy. Zat\u00edm ale doch\u00e1z\u00ed k prav\u00e9mu opaku: chr\u00e1my se vyprazd\u0148uj\u00ed, kl\u00e1\u0161tery zav\u00edraj\u00ed pro nedostatek povol\u00e1n\u00ed, po\u010det
\nnovokn\u011b\u017e\u00ed\u00a0poklesl n\u011bkdy a\u017e o 90 procent.\u201c<\/p>\n

Pape\u017ei Benediktovi nelze podle Mal\u00e9ho samoz\u0159ejm\u011b up\u0159\u00edt hlubokou v\u00edru a vnit\u0159n\u011b\u00a0poctiv\u00e9 katolick\u00e9 sm\u00fd\u0161len\u00ed. \u201eJe ale\u00a0nesnadn\u00e9 p\u0159iznat si sv\u016fj vlastn\u00ed omyl, to znamen\u00e1 \u017ee jsem\u00a0spolupracoval na n\u011b\u010dem, co se nejen neosv\u011bd\u010dilo, ale\u00a0tak\u00e9 uk\u00e1zalo jako katastrof\u00e1ln\u00ed. Nejde o to anulovat Druh\u00fd vatik\u00e1nsk\u00fd koncil, kter\u00fd nepochybn\u011b byl pr\u00e1voplatn\u00fdm c\u00edrkevn\u00edm sn\u011bmem s minim\u00e1ln\u011b 90 procenty katolicky pravov\u011brn\u00fdch tez\u00ed, kter\u00e9 lze v\u017edycky pou\u017e\u00edt, ale o to zaujmout kritick\u00fd vztah ke sporn\u00fdm tvrzen\u00edm v\u011brou\u010dn\u011b nez\u00e1vazn\u00fdch\u00a0dokument\u016f Dignitatis Humanae, Nostra Aetate nebo Gaudium et Spes. Toho jsme se od pape\u017ee Benedikta \u017eel nedo\u010dkali,\u201c povzdychl si katol\u00edk Mal\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Benedikt vy\u0161el vst\u0159\u00edc tradicionalist\u016fm a h\u00e1jil tradi\u010dn\u00ed m\u0161i<\/h4>\n

Historik Mal\u00fd p\u0159ipom\u00edn\u00e1, \u017ee Benedikt XVI. vy\u0161el maxim\u00e1ln\u011b vst\u0159\u00edc katolick\u00fdm tradi\u010dn\u00edm katol\u00edk\u016fm t\u00edm, \u017ee uvolnil \u0159\u00edmsk\u00fd ritus sv. Pia V. (tradi\u010dn\u00ed tridentsk\u00e1 m\u0161e), jen\u017e p\u0159estal b\u00fdt n\u011b\u010d\u00edm podez\u0159el\u00fdm. Z\u00e1rove\u0148 tak\u00e9 zru\u0161il exkomunikaci biskup\u016f tradi\u010dn\u00edho Kn\u011b\u017esk\u00e9ho bratrstva sv. Pia X. a zah\u00e1jil s n\u00edm\u00a0rozhovory o regulaci jeho\u00a0postaven\u00ed uvnit\u0159 Katolick\u00e9 c\u00edrkve.<\/p>\n

\u201eKv\u016fli tomu, jako\u017e i kv\u016fli sv\u00fdm vyj\u00e1d\u0159en\u00edm ve v\u011bci homosexualismu, antikoncepce a potrat\u016f,\u00a0se stal pro neomarxisticky a zedn\u00e1\u0159sky orientovan\u00e1 m\u00e9dia ter\u010dem hrub\u00fdch \u00fatok\u016f a napad\u00e1n\u00ed. Nen\u00ed mimo jin\u00e9 i toto jedn\u00edm z d\u016fvod\u016f jeho rezignace?\u201c pt\u00e1 se Mal\u00fd. \u201eNev\u00edme, to bychom se dostali do roviny pouh\u00fdch nepodlo\u017een\u00fdch spekulac\u00ed,\u201c vz\u00e1p\u011bt\u00ed odpov\u00edd\u00e1.<\/p>\n

Zabr\u00e1nil triumfu jakob\u00edn\u016f?<\/h4>\n

\u201eNa z\u00e1klad\u011b objektivn\u00ed anal\u00fdzy m\u016f\u017eeme\u00a0hodnotit pontifik\u00e1t Benedikta XVI. kladn\u011b, by\u0165 kriticky s t\u00edm, \u017ee se nevymanil z my\u0161lenkov\u00e9ho\u00a0kli\u0161\u00e9 koncilov\u00e9ho \u00b4otev\u0159en\u00ed se\u00a0C\u00edrkve sv\u011btu\u00b4. Benedikt dos\u00e1hl sv\u00e9ho \u00b4triumfu\u00b4 t\u00edm, \u017ee ubr\u00e1nil z pozice nejvy\u0161\u0161\u00edho velekn\u011bze a\u00a0 n\u00e1m\u011bstka Kristova ii proti zna\u010dn\u00e9 \u010d\u00e1sti biskup\u016f katolickou ortodoxii, nicm\u00e9n\u011b je\u00a0zde nep\u0159\u00edjemn\u00e1 ot\u00e1zka, jestli se nejedn\u00e1 o Lafayettovo v\u00edt\u011bzstv\u00ed na Martov\u00fdch pol\u00edch, po n\u011bm\u017e p\u0159i\u0161lo tsunami likvidace v\u0161ech dosavadn\u00edch po\u0159\u00e1dk\u016f.\u00a0Toto re\u00e1ln\u00e9 nebezpe\u010d\u00ed\u00a0se m\u016f\u017ee velmi brzy st\u00e1t\u00a0benediktoratzingerovskou tragikou, pokud j\u00ed u\u017e nen\u00ed jeho abdikace, ale nep\u0159edb\u00edhejme ud\u00e1lostem a ned\u00e1vejme prostor spekulac\u00edm,\u201c \u0159\u00edk\u00e1 historik.<\/p>\n

\u201eC\u00edrkev m\u00e1 ale zaji\u0161t\u011bno trv\u00e1n\u00ed a\u017e do konce sv\u011bta, proto i kdyby do\u0161lo k nejhor\u0161\u00edmu, tedy k\u00a0napln\u011bn\u00ed vize Mel\u00e1nie Calvatov\u00e9 z La Salletty, \u017ee \u00b4\u0158\u00edm se stane s\u00eddlem Antikrista\u00b4, tak katolick\u00e1 pravda z\u016fstane trvale viditeln\u00e1 a B\u016fh nedopust\u00ed, aby se nestala pro v\u0161echny poctiv\u00e9 a v\u011brn\u00e9 du\u0161e
\nz\u0159ejmou,\u201c uzav\u0159el svou \u00favahu historik Mal\u00fd.<\/p>\n

Tradicionalistick\u00fd c\u00edrkevn\u00ed historik<\/h4>\n

Radom\u00edr Mal\u00fd vystudoval Filozofickou fakultu dne\u0161n\u00ed Masarykovy univerzity. Pot\u00e9 pracoval jako historik Um\u011bleckohistorick\u00e9m muzeu v Krom\u011b\u0159\u00ed\u017ei, v roce 1972 byl z politick\u00fdch d\u016fvod\u016f propu\u0161t\u011bn a byl nucen pracovat mimo sv\u016fj obor. Aktivn\u011b se \u00fa\u010dastnil vyd\u00e1v\u00e1n\u00ed katolick\u00e9ho samizdatu a stal se signat\u00e1\u0159em Charty 77.<\/em><\/p>\n

Po Sametov\u00e9 revoluci byl v Brn\u011b z\u00e1stupcem \u0161\u00e9fredaktora den\u00edku Lidov\u00e1 demokracie a mezi lety 1993 a 1994 \u0161\u00e9fredaktorem k\u0159es\u0165ansk\u00e9ho t\u00fdden\u00edku Sv\u011btlo. Od roku 1996 vyu\u010duje na Teologick\u00e9 fakult\u011b Jiho\u010desk\u00e9 univerzity v \u010cesk\u00fdch Bud\u011bjovic\u00edch.<\/em><\/p>\n

Radom\u00edr Mal\u00fd je autorem \u0159ady odborn\u00fdch \u010dl\u00e1nk\u016f a publikac\u00ed, kter\u00e9 se t\u00fdkaj\u00ed p\u0159edev\u0161\u00edm c\u00edrkevn\u00edch d\u011bjin. Sv\u00e9 \u010dl\u00e1nky t\u00e9\u017e publikuje na webu Institutu sv. Josefa a v \u010dasopisech Te Deum a Immaculata. Sv\u00fdmi n\u00e1zory je v rozporu s liber\u00e1ly a modernisty v r\u00e1mci Katolick\u00e9 c\u00edrkve v \u010cR, kter\u00e9 kritizuje z tradicionalistick\u00fdch pozic. Vloni vydal knihu Nejkrvav\u011bj\u0161\u00ed genocida minulosti a sou\u010dasnosti \u2013 M\u00e1lo zn\u00e1m\u00e9 informace o pron\u00e1sledov\u00e1n\u00ed k\u0159es\u0165an\u016f.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Parlamentn\u00edListy.cz po\u017e\u00e1daly c\u00edrkevn\u00edho historika Radom\u00edra Mal\u00e9ho, kter\u00fd vyu\u010duje na Teologick\u00e9 fakult\u011b Jiho\u010desk\u00e9 univerzity v \u010cesk\u00fdch Bud\u011bjovic\u00edch, aby zhodnotil pontifik\u00e1t pape\u017ee Benedikta XVI., kter\u00fd p\u0159ekvapiv\u011b ozn\u00e1mil svou brzkou abdikaci. \u201eTriumf a tragika Benedikta XVI. Nikoli n\u00e1hodou jsem si vyp\u016fj\u010dil tento n\u00e1zev z knihy Stefana Zweiga Triumf a tragika Erasma Rotterdamsk\u00e9ho. Domn\u00edv\u00e1m…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":155,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":"","_expiration-date-status":"","_expiration-date":0,"_expiration-date-type":"","_expiration-date-categories":[],"_expiration-date-options":[]},"categories":[4,5],"tags":[182,183,180,21,56,181],"class_list":["post-154","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politika","category-svet","tag-benedikt-xvi","tag-druhy-vatikansky-koncil","tag-jan-pavel-ii","tag-jinyma-ocima","tag-katolicka-cirkev","tag-maly"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=154"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":158,"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/154\/revisions\/158"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/155"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=154"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=154"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/pohled.podhrazsky.eu\/subdom\/pohled\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=154"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}